Authors:
Eric Chraibi | INRAE, UMR TETIS, University of Montpellier, AgroParisTech | France
Dr. Jean-Baptiste Féret | INRAE, UMR TETIS, University of Montpellier, AgroParisTech | France
Florian De Boissieu | CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, TETIS, University of Montpellier, AgroParisTech | France
Dr. Nicolas Barbier | IRD - UMR AMAP | France
Sandra Luque | INRAE, UMR TETIS, University of Montpellier, AgroParisTech | France
The ever-increasing pressure on tropical forests implies the need for better characterisation of their properties. This information is crucial for the delineation and protection of the most vulnerable regions. The remote sensing community has reacted by developing new methods for biodiversity variables estimation as potential contributions to the Essential Biodiversity Variable (EBV) framework. Methods based on spectral variation hypothesis and linking spatial heterogeneity of optical imagery with different components of biodiversity show good potential for wide scale biodiversity monitoring. These spectral based methods allow for both alpha (local diversity) and beta (community distribution) diversity estimates at a regional scale. They also make possible the upscaling of biodiversity monitoring results based on costly field surveying efforts. At this time, it is crucial to show that the results from these new remote sensing-based biodiversity indices are robust to atmospheric correction artefacts.
Sentinel-2 satellite data are particularly relevant for vegetation monitoring: the spectral information acquired from Earth surface integrates vegetation chemical, structural and taxonomic information at high spatial resolution, with a five-day revisit period. The exploitation of such data strongly depends on its spatial and temporal consistency after correcting the spectral information from atmospheric effects. Such a consistency is critical for tropical forest monitoring, where cloud cover strongly reduces the availability of operable data, and regional monitoring may require multiple acquisitions.
In this study, we evaluated the stability of the Level-2A (bottom of atmosphere) reflectance products obtained from four different atmospheric correction methods - Sen2cor, Maja, Overland and LaSRC – as well as spectral indices and biodiversity products computed from these reflectance data. When considering pixels with constantly high NDVI values, we made the hypothesis that dense tropical forest should not undergo drastic reversible changes over a short period of time. We selected five Sentinel-2 acquisitions from a forested area located in northern Cameroon over five weeks and compared reflectance data, spectral indices and biodiversity indices derived from the four atmospheric correction methods.
Our results showed that the temporal consistency in reflectance, vegetation indices and biodiversity products over the five-week time step was strongly dependent on the choice of the atmospheric correction method. The temporal stability of L2A-reflectance, spectral indices and diversity indices obtained strongly varied depending on the atmospheric correction method. We found only moderate agreement when comparing the results between methods, even when comparing the aggregated mean values over the full period. Validation is in preparation to allow the comparison between biodiversity patterns with ground observations.
These results highlight the importance of considering the atmospheric correction method used in tropical forest studies. Both reproducibility and validity of biodiversity estimation methods will benefit from systematic explanation and justification of the atmospheric correction method used.