Authors:
Dr. Benjamin Brede | Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing | Netherlands
Louise Terryn | CAVElab - Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment, Ghent University | Belgium
Dr. Nicolas Barbier | Botany and Modelling of Plant Architecture and Vegetation (AMAP) Laboratory, French National ResearchInstitute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Center for International Cooperation in Agricultural Researchfor Development (CIRAD), Scientific Research Nat | France
Dr. Bartholomeus Harm | Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing | Netherlands
Dr. Renée Bartolo | Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Supervising Scientist Branch | Australia
Prof. Kim Calders | CAVElab - Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment, Ghent University | Belgium
Dr. Géraldine Derroire | CIRAD, UMR EcoFoG (Agroparistech, CNRS, INRAE, Université des Antilles, Université de la Guyane) | French Guiana
Dr. Sruthi M. Krishna Moorthy | Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland | United States
Dr. Alvaro Lau Sarmiento | Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing | Netherlands
Dr. Shaun R. Levick | CSIRO Land and Water | Australia
Dr. Pasi Raumonen | Mathematics, Tampere University | Finland
Prof. Dr. Hans Verbeeck | CAVElab - Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment, Ghent University | Belgium
Dr. Tim Whiteside | Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Supervising Scientist Branch | Australia
Jens van der Zee | Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing | Netherlands
Prof. Dr. Martin Herold | Helmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 1.4 Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics | Germany
Calibration of aboveground biomass (AGB) products produced with upcoming missions like BIOMASS and GEDI require accurate AGB estimates, preferably across hectometric reference sites. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) based techniques for individual tree AGB estimation have proven to be unbiased predictors, even for large trees. However, data collection is labour- and time-intense, so that upscaling approaches would be desirable. Unoccupied aerial vehicle laser scanning (UAV-LS) can collect high density point clouds across hectares, but past studies have shown limitations in terms of trunk measurements, which are typically involved in allometric model calibration.
In this study, we propose the combination of TLS and UAV-LS for AGB estimation at reference sites. We included data from four sites located in temperate mixed, wet tropical and wet-dry tropical savanna forests. For each site, coinciding TLS and UAV-LS data was collected, and the point clouds were co-registered. Individual tree point clouds were automatically extracted from the TLS and manually quality-controlled with > 170 trees per site. Subsequently, Quantitative Structure Models (QSMs) were built and reference individual tree AGB was determined from tree wood volume estimates derived and wood density databases. For the UAV-LS, a fully automatic tree segmentation routine was applied and the UAV-LS trees that corresponded to the TLS reference trees were identified. A range of individual tree traits like height and crown diameter were estimated based on the UAV-LS trees. Finally, different AGB modelling strategies were tested using published allometric models, and locally calibrating models with parametric and non-parametric regression techniques. All strategies were cross-validated with leave-one-out cross-validation. Individual tree AGB RMSE ranged between 0.30 and 0.69 Mg across the sites. When summing up individual tree AGB to assess bias in estimation of cumulative AGB, as would be performed to estimate plot-scale AGB, the strategies showed diverging patterns that resulted not always in optimal estimation. However, the non-parametric modelling strategy could robustly produce biases < 5% across the sites.
Even though combined TLS and UAV-LS have high requirements in terms of investment in instruments and training of personnel, this study supports their potential for non-destructive AGB estimation. This is relevant for the calibration and validation of space-borne missions targeting AGB estimation at reference sites.