Authors:
Dr. Estel Cardellach | Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC, IEEC) | Spain
Prof. Antonio Rius | Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC, IEEC) | Spain
Dr. Fran Fabra | Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC-UAB)
Dr. Maria Yurovskaya | Marine Hydrophysical Institute | Russian Federation
Prof. Dr. Vladimir Kudryavtsev | Russian State Hydrometeorological University
Dr. Bertrand Chapron | IFREMER
Response of GNSS reflected signals to wave spectra across cyclones:
The signals transmitted by the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) can be used for other applications beyond navigation and positioning. Earth remote sensing is one of the opportunistic applications of the GNSS, for example, after the signals bounce off the Earth surface as a bi-static radar (GNSS reflectometry, GNSS-R).
The scattering of the L-band GNSS signals off the sea surface is a diffuse process where the incident power is redistributed towards a broad range of directions. According to this process, the rougher the surface the broader the power distribution and the lower the peak power of the reflected ‘echo’. This principle is the base of the ocean wind measurements with GNSS-R missions such as UK TDS1 and NASA CyGNSS. The former demonstrated the concept from spaceborne receivers with a relatively large set of data, whereas the latter is collecting GNSS-R observables from a 8 low earth orbiters since 2016, with a target on tropical cyclones. The wind speed retrievals obtained from these missions are in good agreement with other spaceborne sensors and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models in the low to moderate wind regime [e.g., 1], while the high wind regime introduces some degree of controversy in the community, with distinctive geophysical model functions for different wind regimes [e.g., 2] and reduced sensitivity at the high end. Other aspects to consider are the swell and the stage of development of the wind-driven waves: L-band signals are sensitive to sea wavelengths longer than approximately half a meter, so there is not sensitivity to the fine surface ripple instantly induced as the wind blows. Some of these aspects are particularly relevant in the sea surface characterization across tropical cyclones and other extreme ocean phenomena.
A way to tackle the high-wind regimes consistently with the low and moderate ones was suggested in [3], where a variational approach was taken to both calibrate the GNSS-R observables and estimate the wind speed correction with respect to background information obtained from NWP models. The approach, conceptually similar to that of data assimilation into NWP models, resulted in post-fit residuals similar to those obtained with co-located measurements by the SMAP radiometer, and slightly lower winds than those of SMOS, in both cases for the range of wind speeds up to 50 m/s.
In this study, funded by the ESA CN 4000132954/20/I-NB, we suggest to apply the initial steps of the variational approach onto wave spectra from oceanographic models rather than wind speed from NWP. The main difference is the richer parametrization and complexity of surface roughness phenomena that can be accounted in wave spectra, compared to wind fields from NWP models. The initial goal is to identify whether the GNSS-R observables across hurricanes and typhoons can distinguish between different wave spectra conditions that might correspond to the same wind speed, but typically occupy different sections of the cyclones. The ensemble of model spectra follows the parametric model developed by Kudryavtsev et al. (2021) [4].
Two-dimensional fields of L-band filtered mean square slopes (mss) are then extracted across cyclones, and fed into the variational system. Its forward operator generates synthetic GNSS-R like observables and their analysis might indicate sensitivity to the spectra variations around the cyclone. Actual CyGNSS data that took measurements along the same cyclonic structures will be used to confirm the sensitivity, and variational retrievals to L-band mss will be attempted.
[1] Foti t al., 2015, doi:10.1002/2015GL064204
[2] Ruf et al., 2019, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2833075
[3] Cardellach et al., 2020, doi:10.3390/rs12233930.
[4] Kudryavtsev et al., 2021, doi:10.1029/2020JC016915